W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > March 2016

Re: Call for position statements "PROV: Three Years Later"

From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:41:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJCyKRoAQFrsBSG8NWiiyOmDAWbXJ0+3nOyDrE0Rbc06vAXVkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
Cc: SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>
Sure sounds reasonable.

Again, it's really a light weight workshop so I don't think we were
worrying to much about the whole submission requirements thing.

It was more about hey this sounds like a good time to get together and talk
and see where we are and want to go.

Paul

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote:

> Thanks Paul. So, wouldn't it then be appropriate to make sure that the
> submissions requirements reflect exactly what you just said? Because it
> certainly reads otherwise, hence my concern and criticism. How about:
>
> "HTML or any format is welcome... Authors may want to use tools like x,y,z
> to prepare their articles..."
>
> I *sincerely* would like to understand your version of "simple":
>
> What's "simple" about RASH? Because the acronym says "Simplified"?
> Handcoding type of simple? Or using a desktop tool to write the article,
> and then have it go through a bunch of conversion tools (in which I presume
> authors have to do it from command-line or use a 3rd party service) type of
> "simple"? Or something else that I'm completely missing?
>
> What other tools did the chairs consider?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Sarven
> http://csarven.ca/#i
>
>
> On 2016-03-26 18:21, Paul Groth wrote:
>
>> Hi Sarven,
>>
>> Any format is fine (html, pdf, pptx, .... ). We're just interested in
>> contributions so we can have a good discussion with people using and
>> working with provenance and PROV. It'll all be posted to the web.
>>
>> Just trying to encourage people to use HTML. RASH is pretty simple so a
>> pointer seemed reasonable.
>>
>> No requirement
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca
>> <mailto:info@csarven.ca>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 2016-03-26 14:23, Paul Groth wrote:
>>
>>         To facilitate publication on the Web, authors are encouraged to
>>         submit
>>         documents in HTML, using the RASH framework
>>         <https://github.com/essepuntato/rash> (Research Articles in
>>         Simplified
>>         HTML). Mutliple submissions for different experiences and/or
>>         requirements are welcome. As we are keen to gather as many
>>         experiences
>>         and requirements as possible, it is acceptable for authors to
>> submit
>>         position statements, even if they cannot physically attend the
>>         workshop,
>>         as long as they inform the organizers.
>>
>>
>>     @philarcher1 @w3c Why "..encouraged to submit documents in HTML,
>>     using the RASH framework"? Why favoritism? Why not "HTML" full stop?
>>
>>     https://twitter.com/csarven/status/710510400589041664
>>
>>     @philarcher1 @w3c Explicitly asking for an arbitrary subset of HTML
>>     isn't so different than asking PDF w/ a publisher's authoring
>> guidelines
>>
>>     https://twitter.com/csarven/status/710511988481196032
>>
>>     .@csarven Not my call, I'm afraid (and I agree with you). Profiles
>>     of all sorts of things are becoming more of an issue for us.
>>
>>     https://twitter.com/philarcher1/status/710523984782237696
>>
>>     -Sarven
>>     http://csarven.ca/#i
>>
>>
>>
>
> -Sarven
> http://csarven.ca/#i
>
Received on Saturday, 26 March 2016 17:41:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 26 March 2016 17:41:56 UTC