- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:06:39 -0400
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy@seaborne.org>, Fabien.Gandon@inria.fr
On 06/09/2016 11:44 AM, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > Hey, > > we have a use case where we need an RDF format in XML syntax that > 1. supports named graphs > 2. has a convenient structure for XSLT transformations > > RDF/XML fails at #1, TriX fails at #2. > > I suggest extending RDF/XML with a concept of named graph, Please don't. The more we can get away from RDF/XML the better. How about using the W3C standard SPARQL 1.1 XML results format, with quads: subject, predicate, object and graph? https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/ David Booth
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 18:07:08 UTC