W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2015

Re: SPARQLES usage

From: Laurens Rietveld <laurens.rietveld@vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 11:58:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKjXa4MB6bsyVA5ZO_1Xciip4MqCQ5wa1RnbT1Npp2-=KaiKhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
CC: Carlos Buil Aranda <carlos.buil.aranda@gmail.com>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>, "ahogan@dcc.uchile.cl" <ahogan@dcc.uchile.cl>, "py.vandenbussche@fujitsu.ie" <py.vandenbussche@fujitsu.ie>
>
>
> Thanks for reaching out, and for providing this great service!
>
+1!

>
>
> These things could make my experience better:
> - I don't fully understand the "availability" graph, i.e. why it doesn't
> add up to 100%.
>   Perhaps it can be made clearer—and could it also be made up-to-date?
> - Could the availability / performance / … pages be sortable?
> - When I click a particular endpoint, I reach its status page.
>   (i.e.
> http://sparqles.okfn.org/endpoint?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rdfabout.com%2Fsparql
> )
>   On that status page, it would be nice if I could click through the
> actual endpoint.
> - Maybe basic statistics on an endpoint, when available, would be
> interesting (triple count etc.).
>

I remember the predecessor (Mondeca Endpoint Status) published this kind of
information as well. This was quite useful for other tools (e.g. YASGUI
<http://yasgui.org>).
It would be great if you managed to publish this kind of data again!
(either via SPARQL, or for instance using a Linked Data Fragment
<http://linkeddatafragments.org/>server)

gr Laurens


-- 

VU University Amsterdam

Faculty of Exact Sciences

Department of Computer Science

De Boelelaan 1081 A

1081 HV Amsterdam

The Netherlands

www.laurensrietveld.nl
laurens.rietveld@vu.nl

Visiting address:

De Boelelaan 1081

Science Building Room T312
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2015 10:59:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:57 UTC