W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Property or class?

From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 14:40:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK4ZFVG40tYC0+5iFRQLLiLa-gka570tx9=zccqgWLSdn4WnVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Cc: Hm Hrm <unixprog@googlemail.com>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Victor

It will be easier to answer your question if you provid some explanation of
what "operation" and "precedence" mean in your context.
Otherwise, they can mean many things ...
http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/search/#s=operation
http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/search/#s=precedence


2014-09-01 14:28 GMT+02:00 Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>:

> 01.09.2014, 10:07, "Hm Hrm" <unixprog@googlemail.com>:
> > On 08/31/2014 06:43 PM, Victor Porton wrote:
> >>  Suppose P is a precedence of operation X. Should I write "X a P ." or
> >>  "X :precedence P ." (in Turtle format)?
> >>
> >>  What are (dis)advantages of both variants?
> >
> > Assuming that the property should link instance P to instance X, both of
> > class :Operation, then you should use "X :precedence P".
> >
> > "X a P", a shortcut for "X rdf:type P", would imply that P is an
> > rdf:Class and X an instance of said class P. Extending the semantics of
> > 'rdf:type' and using an instance as a class seems a bad idea.
>
> P is a class (because I want rdf:subClassOf for properties.
>
> But I yet doubt whether an operation should be an instance of precedence.
>
> --
> Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
>
>


-- 

*Bernard Vatant*
Vocabularies & Data Engineering
Tel :  + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
Skype : bernard.vatant
http://google.com/+BernardVatant
--------------------------------------------------------
*Mondeca*
35 boulevard de Strasbourg 75010 Paris
www.mondeca.com
Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 1 September 2014 12:41:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:53 UTC