Re: Call for Linked Research

Hi Paul,

Could you elaborate what you mean by "industrialized procedures" ?  I've been working on Work-Life Balance issues for a long time.  Rest is a  "man made" phenomena, yet a Physician has no easy way to prescribe (relatively) exact doses.

The math is straightforward if you know how the magic FFT Black Boxes work, but the concensus on the standards for "industrialized procedures" is lacking.  Employers are likely to perceive comment on their Social Conscience in an Employee exaustion diagnosis, and that might be the best result one could hope for.

--Gannon
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 7/28/14, Paul Houle <ontology2@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: Call for Linked Research
 To: "Sarven Capadisli" <info@csarven.ca>
 Cc: "Linking Open Data" <public-lod@w3.org>, "SW-forum" <semantic-web@w3.org>
 Date: Monday, July 28, 2014, 9:16 AM
 
 I'd add to all of
 this publishing the raw data,  source code,  and
 industrialized procedures so that results are
 truly reproducible,  as
 few results in
 science actually are.
 ᐧ
 
 On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Sarven
 Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
 wrote:
 > Call for Linked Research
 > ========================
 >
 > Purpose: To encourage
 the "do it yourself" behaviour for sharing and
 reusing
 > research knowledge.
 >
 > Deadline: As soon as
 you can.
 >
 > From http://csarven.ca/call-for-linked-research
 :
 >
 >
 > Scientists and researchers who work in Web
 Science have to follow the rules
 > that
 are set by the publisher; researchers need to have read and
 reuse
 > access to other researchers work,
 and adopt archaic desktop-native
 >
 publishing workflows. Publishers try to remain as the
 middleman for
 > society’s knowledge
 acquisition.
 >
 >
 Nowadays, there is more machine-friendly data and
 documentation made
 > available by the
 public sector than the Linked Data research community.
 The
 > general public asks for open and
 machine-friendly data, and they are
 >
 following up. Web research publishing on the other hand, is
 stuck on one ★
 > (star) Linked Data
 deployment scheme. The community has difficulty eating
 > its own dogfood for research publication,
 and fails to deliver its share of
 > the
 "promise".
 >
 > There is a social problem. Not a technical
 one. If you think that there is
 >
 something fundamentally wrong with this picture, want to
 voice yourself, and
 > willing to continue
 to contribute to the Semantic Web vision, then please
 > consider the following before you write
 about your research:
 >
 > Linked Research: Do It Yourself
 >
 > 1. Publish your
 research and findings at a Web space that you control.
 >
 > 2. Publish your
 progress and work following the Linked Data design
 > principles. Create a URI for everything
 that is of some value to you and may
 > be
 to others e.g., hypothesis, workflow steps, variables,
 provenance,
 > results etc.
 >
 > 3. Reuse and link to
 other researchers URIs of value, so nothing goes to
 > waste or reinvented without good
 reason.
 >
 > 4. Provide
 screen and print stylesheets, so that it is legible on
 screen
 > devices and can be printed to
 paper or output to desktop-native document
 > formats. Create a copy of a view for the
 research community to fulfil
 >
 organisational requirements.
 >
 > 5. Announce your work publicly so that
 people and machines can discover it.
 >
 > 6. Have an open comment system policy for
 your document so that any person
 > (or
 even machines) can give feedback.
 >
 > 7. Help and encourage others to do the
 same.
 >
 > There is no
 central authority to make a judgement on the value of
 your
 > contributions. You do not need
 anyone’s permission to share your work, you
 > can do it yourself, meanwhile others can
 learn and give feedback.
 >
 > -Sarven
 > http://csarven.ca/#i
 >
 >
 
 
 
 -- 
 Paul Houle
 Expert on Freebase,
 DBpedia, Hadoop and RDF
 (607) 539 6254   
 paul.houle on Skype   ontology2@gmail.com

Received on Monday, 28 July 2014 17:01:05 UTC