W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > July 2014

R: two questions about VoID

From: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 12:28:13 +0200
Message-ID: <DUB408-EAS418BA1026BCBDC07E92E7DA0000@phx.gbl>
To: "'Richard Cyganiak'" <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: <public-lod@w3.org>, "'SW-forum Web'" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Thanks for the clarifications!

> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Richard Cyganiak [mailto:richard@cyganiak.de]
> Inviato: venerd́ 4 luglio 2014 11:59
> A: Armando Stellato
> Cc: public-lod@w3.org; SW-forum Web
> Oggetto: Re: two questions about VoID
> 
> Hi Armando,
> 
> On 4 Jul 2014, at 10:52, Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
wrote:
> > I would like to get confirmed is if the definition of void:Dataset is
including
> owl vocabularies.
> 
> Yes, it would be fair to say that owl:Ontology is a subset of
void:Dataset,
> because every such ontology can be fully represented as a set of RDF
triples.
> 
> > All examples in the void specifications (http://www.w3.org/TR/void/),
and
> the definition in section 8 (http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#cheatsheet ) seem
> to suggest the structure of a triple for this property is:
> >
> > dataset                 void:subset        subset_of_dataset
> >
> > …but in section 5.2 (http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#linkset-subset ) it is
> being used in the opposite way:
> >
> > :DBpedia_Geonames a void:Linkset;
> >     void:target :DBpedia;
> >     void:target :Geonames;
> >     void:subset :DBpedia;
> >     void:triples 252000;
> >     .
> >
> > Can anyone confirm if it is the use in 5.2 being wrong?
> 
> Yes, the example is wrong.
> 
> Best,
> Richard
Received on Friday, 4 July 2014 10:28:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:52 UTC