W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > July 2014

Re: two questions about VoID

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:58:30 +0100
Cc: public-lod@w3.org, SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7D9EE44B-5CD0-4FA7-865E-75C804E0432F@cyganiak.de>
To: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
Hi Armando,

On 4 Jul 2014, at 10:52, Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it> wrote:
> I would like to get confirmed is if the definition of void:Dataset is including owl vocabularies.

Yes, it would be fair to say that owl:Ontology is a subset of void:Dataset, because every such ontology can be fully represented as a set of RDF triples.

> All examples in the void specifications (http://www.w3.org/TR/void/), and the definition in section 8 (http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#cheatsheet ) seem to suggest the structure of a triple for this property is:
>  
> dataset                 void:subset        subset_of_dataset
>  
> …but in section 5.2 (http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#linkset-subset ) it is being used in the opposite way:
>  
> :DBpedia_Geonames a void:Linkset;
>     void:target :DBpedia;
>     void:target :Geonames;
>     void:subset :DBpedia;
>     void:triples 252000;
>     .
>  
> Can anyone confirm if it is the use in 5.2 being wrong?

Yes, the example is wrong.

Best,
Richard
Received on Friday, 4 July 2014 09:59:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:52 UTC