W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Evaluation of ontology reuse choices in real-world scenarios

From: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:44:05 -0500
Cc: SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F831482B-6A9B-4E11-9534-1E9F8B6476E5@3roundstones.com>
To: Ghislain Auguste Atemezing <Auguste.Atemezing@eurecom.fr>
Hi Ghis,
Can you be a bit more specific? Are you looking for evaluation criteria?  There is of course basic vocabulary considerations aimed at helping people review a vocabulary to evaluate its usefulness in the Best Practices document but presumably you're looking for more or something different?? [1] 

There is a growing collection of Linked Data books (for developers, execs & academics), including code examples at the Linked Data Developer community site.[2]  Two additional books are being added to the site this week.  Perhaps you can find further guidance in these publications.  Chapter 6 of the Linked Data book (Wood, Zaidman, Ruth) has detailed practical advice on embedding RDFa using Good Relations, FOAF, etc.


Cheers,
Bernadette

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-bp/#VOCABULARIES

[2] http://linkeddatadeveloper.com


On Feb 20, 2014, at 5:25 AM, Ghislain Atemezing <Auguste.Atemezing@eurecom.fr> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> [ Just before I continue  googling , could anyone help me with this naive question on ontology (reuse) evaluation ] 
> 
> How do you (we) evaluate ontology reuse choices in real-world scenarios? Any help, insights, pointers would be more than appreciated . 
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Ghislain
> 
> 
> -------------
> Ghislain Atemezing
> EURECOM, Multimedia Communication Department
> Campus SophiaTech
> 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France
> email: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4- 9300 8178
> Fax: +33 (0)4- 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 19:44:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:48 UTC