- From: エリクソン トーレ <t-eriksson@so.taisho.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:37:38 +0000
- To: Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
> Richard Smith [mailto:richard@ex-parrot.com] > It seems to me that many HTTP headers are just another way of expressing > metadata about resources, and would map naturally to RDF predicates. For > example > > Content-Type: image/jpeg > Content-Length: 514090 > ETag: 7f4cd251e2a7b8584d686bc06454a50e6ae1aaaa > > might map to > > @prefix http: <http://example.com/http/> . > <foo.jpg> http:contentType "image/jpeg" ; > http:contentLength 514090 ; > http:eTag "7f4cd251e2a7b8584d686bc06454a50e6ae1aaaa" . Allow me to point out that Content-Type and Content-Length are meta data not describing the resource, but the entity body/representation (httpRange-14 and all that). For an internal application conflating these into one compound resource is one way of modelling, but in my experience keeping them separate makes things clearer in the end. For what it's worth, Tore
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 23:40:27 UTC