- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:00:24 +1000
- To: Shahim Essaid <essaids@ohsu.edu>
- Cc: "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 17 May 2013 00:00:53 UTC
On 17 May 2013, at 03:03, Shahim Essaid <essaids@ohsu.edu> wrote: > The current definition of op:hasMember declares the range as a conjunction of classes that are also declared disjoint in the ontolgoy. op:hasMember is then used to define class:Group. With OWL reasoning, this classifies class:Group as Nothing and any op:hasMember object assertions cause an inconsistency. Has this already been discussed and is there a proposed fix? Thanks for pointing that out Shahim. We will address this is next release. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Friday, 17 May 2013 00:00:53 UTC