Re: SW Graphical Notation

Thanks, Pat. I did not realize COE worked both ways.

Michael


On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote:

> You might add COE into your list. http://www.ihmc.us/groups/coe/  it maps
> OWL to customized concept map diagrams and allows full editing facilities.
> COE is not currently under active development as no funding is available
> for it, but it is available in a beta release.
>
> Pat Hayes
>
> On Jun 27, 2013, at 10:39 PM, Renato Iannella wrote:
>
> >
> > RDF/OWL have well-defined technical encodings (xml, turtle, etc) but
> there is no such common/accepted representation for a graphical notation.
> > That is, a visual representation of an ontology that captures
> (graphically) all the semantics of RDF/OWL.
> >
> > I have collected a few examples of various graphical notations here:
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/SemWebGraphicalNotation
> >
> > Is there any interest from members of the SWIG to look at this in more
> detail, and potentially propose such graphical notation for RDF/OWL?
> > (This could be via this IG or a new Community Group.)
> >
> > Cheers...
> > Renato Iannella
> > Semantic Identity
> > http://semanticidentity.com
> > Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Michael Uschold
   Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts
   http://www.semanticarts.com
   LinkedIn: http://tr.im/limfu
   Skype, Twitter: UscholdM