On 14 Nov 2012 16:07, "Nathan" <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > > Hi Pat, > > Pat Hayes wrote: >> >> Its not impossible, and in a strong sense this is required by the current RDF semantics, which treats all RDF assertions as timelessly true. > > > Can you refine / expand on this please? I'd presumed RDF to have no consideration of time - e.g time-less; as opposed to being true for all time (timeless). I would rather say that the RDF semantics timelessly treats all RDF assertions as true. Dan > TIA, > > Nathan >
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 16:09:46 UTC