W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > May 2012

Re: PageRank approaches

From: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:29:59 +0200
To: Enrique Pérez Arnaud <enriquepablo@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
Message-ID: <20120514092959.GA30515@netestate.de>

Hello Enrique,

if you have a conjunction of statements (a set of triples) and you take one
statement (triple) away, you can conclude less but you cannot conclude 
something that is wrong with the statement (triple) you took away.

Regards,

Michael Brunnbauer

On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:09:21PM +0200, Enrique Pérez Arnaud wrote:
> Any reasoning software necessarily defines validity. Not what is and what
> is not true, but what kind of information may or may not be true, and what
> would also be true if what may be true is so.
> 
> Would not PageRank compromise the validity of the reasoning software that
> had to analyze its results?
> 
> I mean, for human searches PageRank may be reasonable, but is it so for
> logical searches?
> 
> -- 
> Enrique Pérez Arnaud
> enriquepablo@gmail.com

-- 
++  Michael Brunnbauer
++  netEstate GmbH
++  Geisenhausener Straße 11a
++  81379 München
++  Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80
++  Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 
++  E-Mail brunni@netestate.de
++  http://www.netestate.de/
++
++  Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München)
++  USt-IdNr. DE221033342
++  Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer
++  Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 09:30:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:34 UTC