W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Wiki space for SWIG collaboration Re: Semantic Web for the Film Industry

From: Ghalem Ouadjed (EOWEO) <gouadjed@eoweo.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:22:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4F5E14B3.202@eoweo.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: semantic-web@w3.org
Thank you Dan
Sounds clear and really interesting


Le 12/03/2012 15:57, Dan Brickley a écrit :
> On 12 March 2012 15:45, Ghalem Ouadjed (EOWEO)<gouadjed@eoweo.com>  wrote:
>> Hi
>> so do i. Working also on this kind of project but with a french language
>> strong restriction area and i will not explain why so there...:)
>> I think a wiki could be a nice method but why not a drupal content solution?
> Re wiki, SWIG members (that's us...) are welcome to use W3C's main
> Wiki, http://www.w3.org/wiki/
>
> In fact, it evolved from the old ESW that we set up during the
> original SWAD-Europe and SWAD projects, ages ago. So you'll find a lot
> of SemWeb notes in there already. For more recent example, the Web
> Schemas Task Force wiki pages are all in there, see
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas  and nearby. It's quite a nice
> system --- you can use hierarchical URLs to keep things together, and
> mediawiki templates. In recent weeks I've been using
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals to keep track
> of proposals for schema.org that are being discussed over in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/
>
> As part of this, we got an extension added to the wiki for posting
> markup examples; e.g. see
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Singularity#RDFa_impact ... this is
> really handy!
>
> Also templates are quite easy and let you create simple mini-sites.
> For each Wiki entry that is about a schema.org proposal, I put this in
> the top of the page:
>
> {{Template:SchemaDotOrgProposal|name=Singularity|status=Accepted}}
>
> ...this imports markup and fills out the template based on the content
> in http://www.w3.org/wiki/Template:SchemaDotOrgProposal
>
> In this particular case, the template text is:
>
> <div style="background-color: #FADADD; color: #000; padding:
> 3px;">''This is a [[WebSchemas]] proposal '{{{name}}}'  for
> [http://schema.org/ schema.org]. See
> [[WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals|Proposals listing]] for more.
> Status:  {{{status}}}''</div>
> [[Category:WebSchemas]]
> [[Category:WebSchemaProposals]]
> <br/>
>
> ...this should be reasonably self-explanatory: parameters contain
> values like 'name', 'status'. And the template also adds some relevant
> categories too.
>
> I've nothing against Drupal, but there's a lot to be said for keeping
> notes close to other relate discussions, and a Wiki (especially an
> area of a larger wiki rather than a separate installation) has many
> benefits there.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan
>

-- 
Ghalem Ouadjed Formateur France en Technologies Sémantiques 
Certification et Conseil en Web Sémantique Membre Associé du STI 
International : http://www.sti2.org/associate-members Mob : 0616674816 
gouadjed@eoweo.com | http://blog.eoweo.com | 
http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/ghalem.ouadjed | twitter : @ghalem_ouadjed
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 15:22:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:33 UTC