- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:42:25 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi Andy, On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 10:35 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Promoting well-formed lists would be good. > > On the datatypes, how about encouraging use of the canonical form of the > literal as a step towards value-based, rather than datatype based, data: > > "1"^^xsd:integer not "+0001"^^xsd:integer Thanks, that seems worth considering. > > and maybe ideally only xsd:integer and xsd:decimal, not the other > derived types. That also seems worth considering. > > The restriction of "no labels" is not just about "no cycles" - it's > things that are not tree-like: > > :x1 :p _:a . > :x2 :q _:a . Yes, excellent example. I explained to Pat in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2012Dec/0040.html why I chose the "no labels" restriction instead, but I'm open to considering either. -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 17:42:55 UTC