- From: Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 21:03:47 +1000
- To: adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Sebastian S." <cognescent@gmail.com>, semantic-web@w3.org, topicmapmail@infoloom.com, pragmaticweb@lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de
Hola, On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:52 PM, adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com> wrote: > Is what you are proposing really possible from the ground up? I wonder if > even getting an architecture is possible from the ground up, i.e. without > starting with real world compromises dictated by the job in hand. Not sure if what's proposed is possible from the ground up, but I know it's certainly possible to create an ontology-based complete system, however I doubt "from the ground up" has been defined enough at this point. I've worked on creating full-stack application and systems delivery framework based on ontologies / Topic Maps, both in terms of integration but also as a development tool, and as a way to infer capabilities of services based on their entity / resource rather than clumsy API's. I'm fairly confident that it's the way of the future, but as you probably allude to as well, it's still a bit way off, mostly because whomever comes up with it first or already doing it, are doing it in solitary, much like the TM community watching the spectacle of RDF from the side-lines. Regards, Alex -- Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps --- http://shelter.nu/blog/ ---------------------------------------------- ------------------ http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen ---
Received on Sunday, 19 August 2012 11:04:15 UTC