W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Re-using and labelling other people's terms

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:37:17 -0800
Message-ID: <4ED5A4ED.8070602@topquadrant.com>
To: semantic-web@w3.org
You could use a subPropertyOf  version of A, B, C ...

B is also plausible given your rationale. If people don't like it, they 
don't need to believe you.

foaf:name skos:prefLabel "Please don't use foaf:name, it sucks" .

is probably not a consensus reaching triple ....
but may be appropriate (or not) in some projects. People who disagree 
with this triple, might not use your project.
What you choose to say about a foreign property, is what you choose to 
say, nothing more, and nothing less. If someone reads more into your 
opinion than it merits, that really is their problem not yours.

I don't think there is a single truth, and if your truth differs from 
that of the property authors, well, why is that surprising or difficult.

Jeremy


On 11/25/2011 7:42 AM, Phil Archer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A project I'm working on has produced a concept scheme of classes and 
> properties. I'm now encoding this as an RDF Schema, which is easy for 
> the terms we're minting, but I'm getting in a twist about terms 
> defined elsewhere. Rather than use owl:sameAs etc. I want to use the 
> actual 'foreign' property.
>
> Context: ADMS is a vocab for describing data catalogues, being 
> developed under the EU's ISA Programme [1].
>
> DCAT is the widely used vocab for this sort of thing so we're using a 
> lot of terms from there as well as from DC and FOAF.
>
> So here's my question: ADMS has a class 'Asset' that is semantically 
> identical to DCAT's 'Dataset'. What's the best property to use to add 
> a lexical label of "ADMS Asset" to the existing term dcat:Dataset ?
>
> I see several possibilities:
>
> A) just use rdfs:label. This is potentially bad since a triple store 
> with both DCAT and ADMS schemata would have multiple rdfs:labels for 
> the same thing. That's legal, but possibly unhelpful.
>
> B) use skos:prefLabel. In the context of ADMS, it /is/ the preferred 
> label but, well, it seems a little rude to use this?
>
> C) use skos:altLabel. This is probably safest since one can argue that 
> 'ADMS Asset' is indeed an alternative label for dcat:Dataset, but it 
> seems odd to use altLabel (only) in a schema of any kind.
>
> D) define a specific term for "we know it's called foo in the original 
> but here we call it bar." Who would know to look for it? :-(
>
> E) get over myself and use owl:sameAs to assert the adms:Asset and 
> dcat:Dataset are the same.
>
> I'm tending towards C or possibly A at the moment but it doesn't feel 
> right.
>
> Any advice please?
>
> Thanks
>
> Phil.
>
>
> [1] 
> http://www.semic.eu/semic/view/documents/2011-11-15_ADMS_draft_specification.pdf
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 03:37:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:46 GMT