- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:51:56 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>, Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@sti2.at>, Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Mark Wallace <mwallace@modusoperandi.com>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>, Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com>, Ivan Shmakov <ivan@main.uusia.org>, "<semantic-web@w3.org>" <semantic-web@w3.org>, Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 11:13 -0400, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 09:45 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: > > [ . . . ] They would be very happy with RDF engines which flag blank > nodes as errors or (better) automatically skolemize them. > > I think there's a whole lot to be said for automatically Skolemizing > them. To do it well requires some work, but I think it's feasible for > many kinds of deployment. +1 There was some discussion of this at the RDF Next Steps Workshop, http://tinyurl.com/4pfkz55 but the final W3C decision was not to include this in the current RDF Working Group charter. However, interested parties could independently write up something to propose as a W3C Member Submission. Chimezie Ogbuji and I discussed this a bit at the Cleveland Clinic. I, for one, would have some interest in this. -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:52:26 UTC