- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:11:09 +0100
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
* Nathan wrote: >I'd suggest that this illustrates exactly why we should either go for a >serialization which encourages using RDF tooling, or stick to simple >objects, and /not/ do anything in the middle. > >In the "RDF in JSON" case, well you'd just use the SPARQL query. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2011Mar/0009.html has an example how that might look like if JavaScript had some support for data structure processing, the script linked at the bottom turns SPARQL JSON results into some more palatable format and then uses protoviz to render the data. SPARQL query and the rest of the code are in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2011Mar/att-0009/tr-history.html I didn't include the libraries I used though, see the link above for some pre-processed versions. Processing the SPARQL output would have been okay-ish with jsinq if you could define function objects using some simple syntax like `x => x` like you can do in C# or Haskell or ... -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 01:11:42 UTC