On 1 March 2011 10:50, Ivan Shmakov <ivan@main.uusia.org> wrote: > The “The case for generating URIs by hashing RDF content” paper > [1], dating back to 2002, mentions that “there is no current > canonical serialization standard for RDF”. (Then, they suggest > their own canonical representation.) > > I wonder, has such a standard been since proposed? > > [1] http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002/HPL-2002-216.pdf Yes, it's important to have a standard way canonicalize RDF, or, at least, RDF/XML imho. It's required for xmlsig, I think. I think there was an issue with bnodes ... maybe it's something we can solve. Maybe we can get this quickly to rec status? > > -- > FSF associate member #7257 >Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 13:13:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:41 GMT