- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:27:14 +0000
- To: Phil Archer <phil.archer@talis.com>
- Cc: Peter Williams <pezra@barelyenough.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:07:29 +0000 Phil Archer <phil.archer@talis.com> wrote: > IMO, the answer to your question is a clear 'yes, the generic media > type is appropriate.' Agreed. But if Peter needs to have a talisman to use for, say, content negotiation, he could use something like this: Content-Type: application/rdf+xml;x-vocab=foobar -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 21 January 2011 20:27:22 UTC