Re: fact checking for semantic reasoners

Its been a while since I studied artificial intelligence, but
I remember writing fact checking routines implemented with rules at the time
were pretty basic stuff

The way I did it at the time was to model the fact checking routines
that humans carry out (some professions have specific rules/protocols for
fact checking, such as the legal or the forensics professions, other just
follow their common sense)
and all have their limitations, of course


I am sure the concept can be refined ad libitum

will send you a link to the paper, and would welcome input/feedback


P



On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>wrote:

>
> On 29 Aug 2011, at 11:44, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>
> > ha ha, no- the reasoner (or the ontology) would need to check its facts
> via a simple routine  have a built before it spews its outcome
>
> This simple routine being?
> --e.