On 4/6/11 5:08 PM, glenn mcdonald wrote: > > Context infidelity == you are shifting the landscape that define > the rules of the conversation I was trying to have. > > > Yes, I'm trying to shift the collective conversation around the LOD > Cloud to recognize and include the idea, which really ought to be > fairly uncontroversial, that quantity and quality are intertwined. > Verbosely reified CSV cells, as William noted, are a particularly > obvious example: they increase the number of triples out of proportion > to their usefulness. > > If you don't want to participate in this part of the conversation, > don't. It's a public forum, nobody owns "the context". Until some more > people weigh in, I don't have any idea what "the list" (or, in this > case, the three lists) cares about. Raw scale? Accuracy? User > experience? Nine other things we haven't even mentioned? None of this? Create a new conversation and then you own the context. This is my last reply. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2011 21:12:08 UTC