- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:11:26 +0100
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- CC: Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>, semantic-web@w3.org
Toby Inkster wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:12:45 +0200
> Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net> wrote:
>
>> However, if I have for example three "shortcut relations" (e.g. a
>> skill, an expertise and and interest) in a graph, which have all the
>> same topic, I can't match them to the related cognitive
>> characteristic statement (as you can also see in the original
>> example[1]).
>
> What's wrong with this?
>
> ex:APerson
> cco:skill <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Football_(soccer)> .
>
> ex:CC1
> a cco:CognitiveCharacteristic ;
> cco:agent ex:APerson ; #added this
> cco:characteristic cco:skill ; #added this
> cco:topic <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Football_(soccer)>;
> wo:weight [
> a wo:Weight ;
> wo:weight_value 6.0 ;
> wo:scale ex:AScale
> ];
> cco:activity
> <http://sw.opencyc.org/concept/Mx4rwJRiEpwpEbGdrcN5Y29ycA> .
>
> The following N3 rule would allow you to infer the shortcut property
> from the longer form:
>
> {
> ?cc
> cco:agent ?s ;
> cco:characteristic ?p ;
> cco:topic ?o .
> }
> => { ?s ?p ?o . } .
nice, +1 for Toby's approach from me, and likewise using n3 for all
you're named graph needs.
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 12:12:41 UTC