W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > October 2010

rdfa vs. links

From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:33:14 +0200
To: semantic-web@w3.org
Message-ID: <20101024173314.GA74592@styx.org>
The argument was recently put to me that "rdfa was designed for
layering rdf into html". While I'm not against the idea of doing
this (and am happy to get data this way from people who find
it more convenient to make them available with RDFa) I generally
prefer to make RDF/XML and N3 available and link to them using
meta http-equiv.

So the question is about best practices. I can also layer CSS
and JavaScript in HTML using <script> and <style> tags and in
some circumstances it might actually be convenient to do so
but generally I think is better to link to them as separate
documents. Is this not so also with RDF?

Cheers,
-w
Received on Sunday, 24 October 2010 17:33:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:38 GMT