Re: Are literals owl:Things? from Jeremy Carroll on 2010-10-14 (semantic-web@w3.org from October 2010)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:41:33 -0700
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
CC: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@deri.org>, Jesse Weaver <weavej3@rpi.edu>, semantic-web@w3.org
Message-ID: <4CB724AD.1010504@topquadrant.com>

  Yes


The way to answer this is to assess the truth of

rdfs:Literal rdfs:subClassOf owl:Thing .

In some systems this is a syntax error.
In some systems this is necessarily true.
In no systems is this false.

Jeremy

Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 15:42:01 UTC