- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:35:24 -0400
- To: Roberto Mirizzi <roberto.mirizzi@gmail.com>
- CC: Paul Houle <ontology2@gmail.com>, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
On 10/7/10 1:50 PM, Roberto Mirizzi wrote: > Il 07/10/2010 19:37, Kingsley Idehen ha scritto: >>> We recently discussed about similar issues, anyway it's still quite >>> obsure for me why this: >>> >>> dbpedia:Beijing owl:sameAs ookaboo:topic/28999/Beijing . >> >> >> Where did that come from? Did you make that claim or did something else? > > We discussed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01945.html > Anyway, here I was just using Paul's example about Bejing. :-) > >> >>> ookaboo:topic/28999/Beijing rdf:type sioc:ImageGallery. >>> >>> => dbpedia:Beijing rdf:type sioc:ImageGallery. >>> >>> is not a problem. >> >> Is a problem, that's wrong too :-) > > That's what I mean. :-) Btw, as Michael reports here: > http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Community:Overloading_OWL_sameAs, > the issue is old, well-known, and not uniquely solved. In this case we have a broken triple coming from somewhere. Question is: where? Kingsley > > > Roberto > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2010 18:35:55 UTC