W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2010


From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:49:45 +0000
To: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
CC: Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C9199839.17D8C%michael.hausenblas@deri.org>


This will very likely be addressed in the upcoming RDF WG [1], so I dunno if
it makes sense to launch an XG for this now (that is, we're to late ;)

If (and only if) the JSON/RDF stuff doesn't make it into the final version
of the RDF WG charter, I (with my DERI AC Rep hat on) support a JSON/RDF XG
- so you just need to find two others, then.


[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/09/rdf-wg-charter.html

Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730

> From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
> Organization: webr3
> Reply-To: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:12:41 +0000
> To: Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
> Subject: RDF & JSON
> Resent-From: Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:15:07 +0000
> Hi All,
> What are the odds of getting a group (pref through w3c) set-up quickly
> so that all of those working on and interesting in RDF+JSON can openly
> discuss, align and essentially do the heavy lifting pre-standardization?
> I'm very aware that there are multiple people with multiple approaches
> all working at the same time here, some communication but not loads, and
> that we could all either align and make progress, or end up with another
> 5 semi-supported rdf+json variants before any official effort starts,
> which wouldn't really be ideal.
> Best,
> Nathan
Received on Monday, 29 November 2010 17:50:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:23 UTC