W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Subjects as Literals, [was Re: The Ordered List Ontology]

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:25:53 +0100
To: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, nathan@webr3.org, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100630222553.655e3040@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:18:25 -0700
Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com> wrote:

> Here are the reasons I voted this way:
> 
> - it will mess up RDF/XML

No it won't - it will just mean that RDF/XML is only capable of
representing a subset of RDF graphs. And guess what? That's already
the case.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 21:27:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:36 GMT