W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > June 2010

Re: The Ordered List Ontology

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:45:30 +0100
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.net>, Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100630124530.0c04159f@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:54:20 +0100
Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

> That said, i'm sure sameAs and differentIndividual (or however it is
> called) claims could probably make a mess, if added or removed...

You can create some pretty awesome messes even without OWL:

	# An rdf:List that loops around...

	<#mylist> a rdf:List ;
		rdf:first <#Alice> ;
		rdf:next <#mylist> .

	# A looping, branching mess...

	<#anotherlist> a rdf:List ;
		rdf:first <#anotherlist> ;
		rdf:next <#anotherlist> .

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 11:46:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:36 GMT