On 19 Jun 2010, at 16:47, Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote: > > Greetings. > > Many thanks, everyone, for interesting and thoughtful explanations > here. > > In summary, it seems that: > > * rdf:List isn't fundamentally defective, but > * it is often at least inconvenient to use with SPARQL, and > * it collides with OWL, which has hijacked rdf:List for internal use. We added rdf:List to rdf in the 2004 rdfcore revision, to address some owl-related needs. So 'hijack' is a little unfair :) DanReceived on Saturday, 19 June 2010 15:05:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:20 UTC