Re: What is it that's wrong with rdf:List [summary]

On 19 Jun 2010, at 16:47, Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote:

>
> Greetings.
>
> Many thanks, everyone, for interesting and thoughtful explanations  
> here.
>
> In summary, it seems that:
>
>  * rdf:List isn't fundamentally defective, but
>  * it is often at least inconvenient to use with SPARQL, and
>  * it collides with OWL, which has hijacked rdf:List for internal use.

We added rdf:List to rdf in the 2004 rdfcore revision, to address some  
owl-related needs. So 'hijack' is a little unfair :)

Dan