W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Draft on some weird KR ideas

From: adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:55:57 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=WeKRTDNyiS_g4yd34RmeiN3KLY3-uVuOZXNi3@mail.gmail.com>
To: semantic-web@w3.org
Confused.
What is weird about this? Peirce is the father of KR and Ontology or, rather
of central to Pragmatist Philosophy and frequently quoted in the KR
literature. I don't know enough, but isn't this what already is? If not how
is it different?
If it is different you should push it further as you are surely describing
what *should* be meant by KR and RDF.
But, so far, it just seems like a strategy for setting up triples and their
treatment, nothing special.
What have I missed?
I really am very confused.

Adam

On 29 July 2010 08:01, SebXama <snsama@hotmail.es> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Anyone who has the time or is willing to read something rare, I'm
> trying to take a different approach to knowledge representation (KR). I
> don't
> know if it is new or even useful stuff neither
>
> https://xama.dev.java.net/files/documents/7100/151869/krdraft.pdf
>
> I'm trying to develop further those ideas to find useful applications
> (if there is one at all!)
>
> Regards,
> Sebastián Samaruga
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Draft-on-some-weird-KR-ideas-tp29293634p29293634.html
> Sent from the w3.org - semantic-web mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 30 July 2010 08:56:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:21 UTC