W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > July 2010

Re: Subjects as Literals

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:17:11 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTinBnwFRrwjX-yyBT19acMlXGw3trJcukblKXL81@mail.gmail.com>
To: nathan@webr3.org
Cc: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Ross Singer <rossfsinger@gmail.com>, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 6 July 2010 13:34, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> Danny Ayers wrote:

>> :Jo rdfs:value "Jo"
>>
>> together with
>>
>> :Jo rdf:type rdfs:Literal
>>
>> ?
>
> 1: is there and rdfs:value? (rdf:value)

My mistake, it is rdf:value

> 2: I would *love* to see rdf:value with a usable tight definition that
> everybody can rely on

It's certainly usable, but the definition is about as open as it could be:

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/#rdfvalue

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_value

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#rdfValue

...in fact it rather resembles a bnode in the property position.

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 
http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 19:06:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:21 UTC