- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:58:34 -0500
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:42 +0000, Steve Harris wrote: > On 25 Jan 2010, at 16:23, Dave Beckett wrote: [ . . . ] > > I was more thinking of allowing something like > > > > <s> <p> <o> <g> . > > That has the same issues. It's not the syntax, it's the maybe named > graphs, maybe not thing. Can you shed some light on why this information -- whether the RDF may contain named graphs -- needs to be determinable from the serialization type? And does this mean that you'd like two formats: Turtle-NG, which could carry named graphs, and plain Turtle (a subset of Turtle-NG), which couldn't? -- David Booth, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic (contractor) Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 14:59:02 UTC