- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:05:02 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:14 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote: > One of the things I failed to realize in time to > put my weight behind it was that an approach to datatyping based on > interpretation properties, which was proposed by Dan Connolly, could be as > convenient to use, if not more so, than the current datatyping scheme, and would > keep the core of RDF very much simpler. I agree. The interpretation properties[1] approach is very general, clean and logical. If it feels inconvenient, that seems to me like an argument for syntactic sugar rather than a different approach. 1. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/InterpretationProperties.html -- David Booth, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic (contractor) Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 14:05:29 UTC