W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > February 2010

Re: RDF/XML Syntax Question: Label on an RDF Object being a literal

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 00:55:35 +0100
Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd1002281555q79740d7el817ae77a7749c225@mail.gmail.com>
To: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
Cc: Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@sun.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
sorry, Bristol English - creep and go

On 1 March 2010 00:50, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote:

> just remembered a local dialect thing "mon crape un goo" - get the bits
> that work, and run with them. That is what my granny used to say.
>
> On 1 March 2010 00:31, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am not a logician, but I believe there has been some hair-tugging over
>> the treatment of literals & resources. Technically and mathematically, it's
>> wrong as it it stands in the specs. Bit strange given that the people behind
>> it were the best in the world, but there you go.
>>
>> Until a reformulation of the RDF model comes along, we have to play with
>> it pragmatically - a literal is a string etc.
>>
>> Please don't be scared by the fact that there are errors, it's usable,
>> this stuff can be applied to the wire.
>>
>> The Italians say piano piano to mean we just do a little, and get their
>> eventually.  A better saying is "may you live in interesting times", major
>> curse. But that is where we are.
>>
>> Love,
>> Danny.
>>
>>
>> On 28 February 2010 23:34, Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, substitute rdfs:label for ex:readableLabel there.
>>>
>>> Damian
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://danny.ayers.name
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://danny.ayers.name
>
>


-- 
http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Sunday, 28 February 2010 23:56:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:34 GMT