On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Bob DuCharme <bob@snee.com> wrote: > Hi Johan, > >>SPARQL result xml is not a full solution because it is limited to ASK and >> SELECT queries. > > Can you give me some examples of a need to process RDF with XSLT where the > results of a SELECT query were inappropriate? I confess that I've been wondering the same myself. For any given RDF, a SPARQL result can contain all the information, or any desired subset, often in a more convenient form. For instance, an RDF document can have the subjects and predicates in any order, but a SPARQL result can order everything to creating groupings that would make subjects and predicates easier to deal with: SELECT ?s ?p ?o FROM <graph:uri> WHERE { ?s ?p ?o } ORDER BY ?s ?p ?o Sure, the elements aren't nested, but everything is there, and it's completely deterministic. Regards, PaulReceived on Monday, 26 April 2010 23:00:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:35 GMT