2009/11/3 Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>: > ok, so this is a wishlist, so I am allowed to just add my "in an ideal > world"-personal-my-private-little-hat-on favorites :-) > > I have the following: > <snip> > - closing the XML-RDF gaps: It seems that the XML and RDF languages specing > goes determined parallel > paths in W3C with no real visible perspective for convergence. Integrated > XML+RDF query languages, > or maybe an XG for XML2RDF/RDF2XML would be cool: GRDDL is a starting > point, but the current way to > translate into RDF/XML and then use XML transformation languages instead > of directly using SPARQL/SPARQL-Update > seems like an unnecessary detour. Isn't that what the XSPARQL submission you were involved in is about? [1] Is there a better method for transformations that has been designed so far? Cheers, Peter [1] http://www.w3.org/Submission/2009/01/Received on Monday, 2 November 2009 21:59:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:47 GMT