Jie Bao wrote: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: >> So, what should W3C standardize next in the area of RDF, if anything? > > replace (with backward compatibility assurance) the use of plain > literals with rdf:PlainLiteral [1] - this datatype is defined in the > RDF namespace anyway. Yuck! I thought the idea was to improve RDF? ;-) DamianReceived on Monday, 2 November 2009 15:55:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:47 GMT