Dave Raggett wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Simon Reinhardt wrote: > >> Toby Inkster wrote: >>> a) Tt would remove the restriction on subjects being literals. > > ... > >> But that doesn't work with >> >> "foo" ex:predicate "bar" . > > Doesn't that depend on the predicate, e.g. how about a predicate that is > true if the subject and object are both string literals and the subject > is shorter than the object. > > e.g. "a" ex:shorterThan "aaa" > > where such statements should be the result of an inference. Sure, or computed properties [1]. But my comment was more about the fact that Toby's idea of creating inverses for compatibility doesn't work when both sides are literals. Regards, Simon [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SPARQL/Extensions/Computed_PropertiesReceived on Monday, 2 November 2009 11:18:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:47 GMT