W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > May 2009

Re: common standard ontology

From: carmen <_@whats-your.name>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 22:41:33 -0400
To: 'SW-forum' <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20090511024133.GA5897@x>
> advocates a common standard ontology

is HTML not a standard ontology of document elements? 

personally i'd advocate gutting it to just <div>s. then you could get rid of the SGML/XML baggage/overhead/ugliness in the syntax entirely

we'd prob ably be still figuring out agreeble ways to map sexps() to on-screem/mem DOMish trees, instead of have a usable web

or justifying the validity of RDFa as a use case enable to various gods instead of dragging vcard's to our email apps..


> If any readers think that they have an ideal ontology in mind, I'd
> like to ask one question:  Do you believe that you have sufficient
> hype and money to make your preference become the new mainstream?

how would one create something like the web without a hype machine like the web to catapult it into instant ubiquity?

> John Sowa
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 11 May 2009 02:46:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:29 GMT