> advocates a common standard ontology is HTML not a standard ontology of document elements? personally i'd advocate gutting it to just <div>s. then you could get rid of the SGML/XML baggage/overhead/ugliness in the syntax entirely we'd prob ably be still figuring out agreeble ways to map sexps() to on-screem/mem DOMish trees, instead of have a usable web or justifying the validity of RDFa as a use case enable to various gods instead of dragging vcard's to our email apps.. > If any readers think that they have an ideal ontology in mind, I'd > like to ask one question: Do you believe that you have sufficient > hype and money to make your preference become the new mainstream? how would one create something like the web without a hype machine like the web to catapult it into instant ubiquity? > John Sowa > >Received on Monday, 11 May 2009 02:46:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:29 GMT