W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Video on RDFa in Drupal - examples and use cases

From: Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:02:20 +0100
To: Semantics-ProjectParadigm <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20090322230220.GF4094@volans.logilab.fr>

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 07:52:45AM -0700, Semantics-ProjectParadigm wrote:

> We do agree with you that most CMSs are poor products in terms of software
> engineering.
> The next best thing does not exist yet, unfortunately.

http://www.cubicweb.org would like to be the next best thing and is
looking for feedback and new users (it is licensed under the LGPL).

I claim that we did our homework before going public with this
framework and correctly engineered the thing. Where do you want me to
start to try to prove that claim? Would pointing you to the blog_ and
the doc_ help to get the discussion started or would it be better to
try to tease you with a direct link to the schema_ and its OWL_ view?
Another way to raise people's interest might be to have them use the
rdf views, like sioc_ or doap_, don't you think? Would they rather
peek at the list of components_ before they ask for new tickets in the
issue tracker_? I'm not sure where to start... :)

.. _blog: http://www.cubicweb.org/blog
.. _doc: http://www.cubicweb.org/doc/en/
.. _schema: http://www.cubicweb.org/schema
.. _OWL: http://www.cubicweb.org/view?vid=owl
.. _sioc: http://www.cubicweb.org/blogentry/212906?vid=sioc
.. _doap: http://www.cubicweb.org/project/cubicweb?vid=doap
.. _components: http://www.cubicweb.org/project?vtitle=All+cubicweb+projects
.. _tracker: http://www.cubicweb.org/project/cubicweb

Nicolas Chauvat

logilab.fr - services en informatique scientifique et gestion de connaissances  
Received on Sunday, 22 March 2009 23:02:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:10 UTC