Hi Chris, > Hi, > > I'm at the brainstorming stage of a semantic application, and I'd like to > get some feedback. I'd like to create a web application that would provide a > structured debating format that would incorporate semantic rules and logic > entered by users. The basic idea is that a user would enter an assertion, > evidence, and definitions, and other users would vote on the accuracy of > these elements, or extend them with their own arguments. The system would > also make an attempt to validate logical arguments, and show where a user's > line of reasoning is incomplete, flawed, or contradictory, and would need > correction or clarification. "Argumentation" might be similar to what you are proposing: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=58581 An application in bioinformatics is presented in (open access article): http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/24/13/i304 Tore _______________________________________________________________ <> dc:creator [ foaf:name "Tore Eriksson", "トーレ エリクソン"@jp; foaf:mbox_sha1sum "2bd9291b301f112775e118f96eb63314594b1a86"; foaf:workplaceHomepage <http://www.taisho.co.jp/> ].Received on Thursday, 19 March 2009 03:50:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:38 GMT