RE: Vocabularies for content keyword classification?

You may also be interested in

 

http://scot-project.org/

 

"SCOT is an acronym for Social Semantic Cloud of Tags. The name was chosen to emphasise the goal of providing a consistent framework for expressing social tagging at a semantic level in machine-understandable way."

 

and

 

http://int.ere.st/


Regards,

Gustavo Frederico

 

 
> From: dbooth@hp.com
> To: peter.krantz@gmail.com; semantic-web@w3.org
> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:23:56 +0000
> Subject: RE: Vocabularies for content keyword classification?
> 
> > From: Peter Krantz
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I am in a government project where we are implementing RDF as a format
> > for legal information meta data from close to a hundred government
> > organizations. One ambition is to preserve the unstructured content
> > classification that many of these documents have today. Typically a
> > document has one or more keywords entered at the time of creation.
> > These are not from a controlled vocabulary and can be viewed more like
> > "tagging".
> > 
> > Since I am a beginner in the semweb field I would be grateful 
> > for your ideas.
> > 
> > 1. What vocabularies have you used to define a single free text
> > keyword? We'd rather use an existing term instead of inventing our
> > own.
> > 
> > 2. For those organizations that have made an effort to structure their
> > list of keywords, what would you advise them use to make it easy for
> > them to publish it online and make references instead of free text
> > keywords in their document metadata?
> > 
> > Thanking you in advance,
> > 
> > Peter Krantz
> 
> Would WordNet help?
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordNet
> 
> 
> 
> David Booth, Ph.D.
> HP Software
> +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com
> http://www.hp.com/go/software
> 
> Statements made herein represent the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of HP unless explicitly so stated.
>