W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > March 2009

Re: [ontolog-forum] EU FP Ontology projects

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@pioneerca.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 12:36:19 -0800
Message-ID: <1518D0576BB448D99A59B2B077037866@rhm8200>
To: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>, "Azamat" <abdoul@cytanet.com.cy>
Cc: "SW-forum" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "KR-language" <KR-language@YahooGroups.com>, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net>
Re: [ontolog-forum] EU FP Ontology projectsI have defined "context" to be a list of propositions.
But the propositions may refer to the hierarchy.

Here is a list of propositions

    Dick McCullough isu person;
    Duane Nickull isu person;
    person iss entity;

which is the same as this hierarchy

    begin hierarchy people;
    entity;
    /    person;
    //        i:Dick McCullough;
    //        i:Duane Nickull;
    end hierarchy people;

Dick McCullough
Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done;
mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done;
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://mKRmKE.org/

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Duane Nickull 
  To: [ontolog-forum] ; Richard H. McCullough ; Azamat 
  Cc: SW-forum ; KR-language 
  Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 12:06 PM
  Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] EU FP Ontology projects


  Richard:

  Do you see "Context" strictly as a hierarchic node?  I see it more of an omnipotent concept covering all other concepts.  Would not a relation and action have contextual impact on the actual pragmatics?

  Duane


  On 01/03/09 11:59 AM, "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@pioneerca.com> wrote:


    Azamat said
     
    I wonder how  can it cover many different views with such 
    a narrow reading of relationship, knowledge, and context? 
     
    I neglected to make a very important point.
    This entity-characteristic-proposition hierarchy
     
    begin hierarchy tabula rasa;
       existent;
       /    entity; # physical Entity
       /    group;  # abstract Entity
       /    characteristic;  # property
       //       attribute;
       //       part;
       ///          context;
       ///          sentence;
       //       relation;
       //       action;
       //       interaction;
       /    proposition;
     
       sentence;
       /    statement;
       /    question;
       /    command;
       /    assignment;
       /    production;
       /    conditional;
       /    iteration;
       /    quantification;
    end hierarchy tabula rasa;
     
    is my preferred hierarchy.
     
    But the mKR/mKE system can dynamically 
    transform tabula rasa into another hierarchy
    by concept integration and differentiation,
    or it can use your favorite hierarchy instead.
     
     
    Dick McCullough
    Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done;
    mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done;
    knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
    knowledge haspart proposition list;
    http://mKRmKE.org/



  -- 
  **********************************************************************
  Duane Nickull, Vancouver, BC Canada
  Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe LiveCycle ES and Enterprise
  Duane's World TV Show - http://tv.adobe.com/#pg+1537
  Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
  Twitter - http://twitter.com/duanechaos
  Community Open Source Music - http://www.mixmatchmusic.com
  My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
  **********************************************************************




image.png
(image/png attachment: image.png)

Received on Sunday, 1 March 2009 20:37:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:28 GMT