Re: .htaccess a major bottleneck to Semantic Web adoption / Was: Re: RDFa vs RDF/XML and content negotiation from Damian Steer on 2009-06-26 (semantic-web@w3.org from June 2009)

From: Damian Steer <d.steer@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:31:17 +0100
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
CC: public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <4A449565.4030902@bristol.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Toby Inkster wrote:

> Jena (just testing on sparql.org) doesn't seem to handle RDFa at all.

The jena GRDDL reader handles RDFa. [1]

I've started toying with writing a (direct) RDFa parser, too.

Damian

[1]
<http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/javadoc/com/hp/hpl/jena/grddl/GRDDLReader.html#setProperty(java.lang.String,%20java.lang.Object)>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpElVQACgkQAyLCB+mTtylxUACgu6V+4spvcJeGyZGoq+pInOV4
6SgAoKv3/7ivJQNLwnpCUwHgYIkH8V6F
=RDbW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 26 June 2009 09:32:35 UTC