On 5 Jun 2009, at 23:56, Dan Brickley wrote: > Hi all, > > In the FOAF spec we have for a while had various ways of finding an > RDF > description of the vocabulary. The server supports content > negotiation, > or you can go to http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/index.rdf ... or the HTML > doc has in it's header, > <link href="http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/index.rdf" rel="alternate" > type="application/rdf+xml" /> > > In addition, the XHTML spec has usually had RDF/XML embedded directly > inside it. I think - especially with the rise of RDFa, the time has > come > to switch this off. It makes the document ill-formed, and isn't a > widely > used deployment style. +1 > > > Would any object if future versions of the FOAF spec didn't embed > RDF/XML in the XHTML? The RDF (ie. RDFS/OWL) will still be accessible > via content negotiation and a link to index.rdf as above. In > addition we > can add some RDFa, covering some (and perhaps eventually all) of the > RDF > statements from the schema. Libby's begun working on the latter piece. Good idea. > Let me know ASAP if you have tools or services that rely on the RDF/ > XML > within HTML and we can work something out... > > cheers, > > Dan > _______________________________________________ > foaf-dev mailing list > foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-devReceived on Saturday, 6 June 2009 12:02:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:43 GMT