On 6 Jun 2009, at 01:07, Danny Ayers wrote: > I would very much like to see the continuation of there being a HTML > version and an RDF/XML version of the spec available through conneg. > Standards and all that. What troubles me a little is that if the HTML > version uses RDFa, it's going to be hard to keep versions in sync, all > complete. Surely with there being two versions already (HTML and RDF/XML), there is still opportunity for them to become out of sync. I don't see how adding RDFa to the HTML version makes that any worse. The syncing problem is greatly reduced by using a script to generate one version from the other (whichever way around you choose to do it), which is indeed what is done for the FOAF spec. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>Received on Saturday, 6 June 2009 05:53:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:43 GMT