Dan Brickley wrote: > Would any object if future versions of the FOAF spec didn't embed > RDF/XML in the XHTML? The RDF (ie. RDFS/OWL) will still be accessible > via content negotiation and a link to index.rdf as above. In addition we > can add some RDFa, covering some (and perhaps eventually all) of the RDF > statements from the schema. Libby's begun working on the latter piece. It will come as a shock to no one that I think this is a good idea :) In general, I like RDFS using RDFa, because it provides a nice human FYN story. We do this at CC: http://creativecommons.org/ns That's a human-readable spec, which is nice for folks who don't know the details of RDF up front. Yes I know it can be done via redirects, but I think this approach is a bit clearer. -BenReceived on Saturday, 6 June 2009 01:29:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:43 GMT