http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/ says text/turtle http://www.dajobe.org/2004/01/turtle/ says application/turtle Both say application/x-turtle should be used until the registration is submitted. Maybe that's the right approach for now. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org> wrote: > The tabulator code has > > sf.mediatypes['text/n3'] = {'q': '1.0'} // as per 2008 spec > > sf.mediatypes['text/rdf+n3'] = {'q': 0.5} // pre 2008 spec > sf.mediatypes['application/x-turtle'] = {'q': 0.2} // pre 2008 > sf.mediatypes['text/turtle'] = {'q': 1.0} // pre 2008 > > The application for text/n3 is pending, but I can't remember what he status > of *turtle*. I think it was switched to text/turtle, but not sure. > > Tim > > > On 2009-04 -29, at 10:38, Ian Davis wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org> wrote: > >> Hugh, >> >> http://southampton.rkbexplorer.com/models/void.ttl >> is served up as text/plain -- could you serve it as text/n3 ? >> >> Thanks, Tim >> > > > Is text/n3 best or application/turtle? Neither are registered but > application/turtle would be most accurate. I'm only asking because I'm > currently serving up turtle from http://ol.dataincubator.org/ as > text/plain and I'd like to fix that. > > Ian > > >Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 16:53:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:39 GMT